In
"Matters," I wanted to explore apathy as a political position and
explore my feelings towards it. I believe that our generation—and especially
the predominately white, straight, middle class that I have been raised with—is
especially apathetic. The exact cause of this is circumstance is unclear—though,
I have a few ideas as to what has fed this attitude of “DGAF”edness.
I watched
Lana Del Rey music videos to prepare for this project—to try to feel the
melancholic, detached media that so many young adults seem to identify with. It
took some time to get beyond the singer’s unique, sad beauty, but I eventually
figured out her carefully devised perspective. She, in her art at least,
embodies the sad, rich 50’s housewife. Her videos are all sub-par in terms of
image quality in order to indicate that they are vintage, and she often
incorporates Hamptonsesque locations. She sings of love, drugs, and a simpler
life. Yet, the viewer knows that she has everything that our society values:
beauty, money, talent, fame, gorgeous lovers, etc. Despite having it all, she
is still so incredibly unhappy. This, for some reason, really resonates with a
large portion of my generation. I believe it is because we have been plagued
with a profound feeling of nihilism in our day-to-day life.
Maybe
it’s technology. Our generation is the first to have grown up with electronic
identities—careful performative constructions of our selves. They bear as much
weight as our physical bodies—our place in our social network can be pinpointed
by the number of likes we receive, and our essence can be characterized by the
pages we follow. Yet, we grew up being told that there was a huge difference
between our offline and online actions: our online actions are permanent. Once
they are posted, they can never be taken back. They can never be changed. So
what does that mean for our physical selves? How impermanent is our state of
being in real life? As many of my peers have said, “if you didn’t post it on
Instagram, did it really happen?”
Maybe it’s just a
post-modern predicament. We live in an age of ambiguous meaning. There is no
one single “truth”: art cannot be pinned down, religion is based on the
individual, scientific proof doesn’t even bear meaning in our government. (For
example, how many times has the proof for climate change been dismissed by
politicians because the findings cannot definitively be traced to humans?) We have seen--or at least, we have been told of--instantaneous mass destruction. The atomic bomb showed us that everything we are familiar with can be gone in an instant.
So what does it all mean? Why does it make a difference what I do? Nothing is really tangible, after all. Nothing I do matters.
Yet, of course, everything we do matters. It causes physical or mental change. It morphs our environment. Perhaps our effect on the world is minimal--but we are so closely tied to our surroundings, that what we do matters. From an ideological nihilistic perspective, it may not. But on a physical level, we are matter--therefore we affect matter.
I chose to create my piece with our environmental connectedness in mind. I chose to make the foreground of my drawing with one, continuous, looping line. Even the fragmented, apathetic individual who says that "Nothing [they] do matters" is connected to the rest of the world.
Espen Kluge - 74: Meditation, 2014
Herbert Baglion- Untitled
Rob Gonzalves
Boris Schmitz - This Kiss 3
Unknown - Geometric Mountains
Unknown
Kim Michey
Keith Haring - Silence = Death, 1989
James Collins
James Nares
James Nares
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnxpHIl5Ynw
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.chapman.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=46102b8a-1f3d-49bf-80af-81dc96a7e56d%40sessionmgr111&vid=0&hid=122
http://aliciapatterson.org/stories/placing-risk-between-panic-and-apathy-new-industry-emerges
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6K8Uq88BEQ
http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.chapman.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11&sid=918a8330-1f89-462c-b924-7133126a3446%40sessionmgr115&hid=122
No comments:
Post a Comment